Expert Post-Conviction Representation in your post-conviction journey
Post-conviction relief is about legal motions or petitions filed after a judgment has been finalized, especially when appeals have been exhausted. These motions seek to challenge the legality of the conviction based on different grounds, such as new evidence, constitutional violations, or ineffective legal representation. Post-conviction relief aims to correct legal errors that may have resulted in an unjust conviction or sentence.
We are familiar with the specific legal processes in each state, ensuring that your case is handled with the utmost attention to detail.
Our firm is proficient in handling different types of post-conviction motions, each tailored to address the various sides of the case.
These motions seek to overturn a conviction or sentence based on new evidence, legal errors, or constitutional violations.
We handle motions to challenge convictions or sentences on grounds such as ineffective counsel, newly discovered evidence, or other post-conviction claims.
Federal habeas corpus motions are filed after all state-level remedies have been exhausted. These motions challenge convictions or sentences in federal appellate court.
Our expert team helps you file a motion to reduce your sentence if your sentence was unduly harsh or illegally imposed.
New evidence that could alter the outcome of your case can be grounds for filing a motion to reopen your case.
When an attorney fails to provide effective representation during a trial, we can help file a motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
If you took a plea deal under pressure, confusion, or without fully understanding it, we can help you file a motion to withdraw your plea.
Post-conviction relief can be based on various grounds, including but not limited to:
Post-conviction cases are decided based on several key factors, including:
To successfully claim ineffective assistance of counsel, you must demonstrate the following:
Several key Supreme Court decisions have significantly impacted post-conviction relief law, including:
Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.
If you believe your conviction or sentence is unjust, it’s time to act. Brownstone Law has extensive experience in post-conviction relief and is here to help you navigate the complex federal RICO or racketeering and conspiracy appeals in federal courts.. Whether you’re seeking to vacate your conviction, reduce your sentence, or file a writ of habeas corpus, our team is ready to fight for your rights.
Through post-conviction motions, an individual may seek to:
Some common grounds for post-conviction relief include:
While an appeal reviews the trial court’s decisions for errors of law, the post-conviction process provides an opportunity to challenge a conviction or sentence based on issues that could not have been raised in the initial trial or appeal (such as ineffective assistance of counsel or new evidence). Post-conviction proceedings usually involve a deeper review of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.
State habeas corpus is a legal petition filed in state court challenging the lawfulness of an individual’s detention or imprisonment. While federal habeas corpus is used to challenge federal convictions, state habeas corpus is used to challenge state convictions or sentences.
State habeas corpus can be used to challenge the length or legality of a sentence. For example, if a defendant believes their sentence is unlawful, disproportionate, or imposed in violation of state or federal law, they can file a habeas petition requesting a reduction. Possible arguments include:
Yes, state habeas corpus can be used to vacate a plea if there are valid grounds to challenge the plea’s legality. Common reasons include:
Yes, a state habeas petition can be used to set aside a conviction if the conviction was obtained in violation of the defendant’s rights. This includes situations where there was:
State habeas corpus can be used to challenge a conviction if the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. To succeed, the petitioner must show that their attorney's performance was deficient and that the deficiency resulted in prejudice—meaning that the outcome of the trial would likely have been different if the attorney had performed adequately.
To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must satisfy the Strickland v. Washington test, which requires demonstrating:
The time limits for filing a state habeas petition vary by state but are generally set at one year from the final judgment or from the date a legal error is discovered. In some cases, the time limit can be extended if new evidence comes to light.
To file a state habeas petition, you must:
Yes, if the state habeas petition is denied, the petitioner can generally appeal the decision to a higher state court, such as the state court of appeals or state supreme court.